This led to the manufacturers focusing more on performance, and comfort (www.driverstechnology.co.uk). .
By 1970, vehicle related deaths were said to be declining. This meant that the vehicle safety committee's tried to turn their attention more to the adoption of mandatory seatbelt laws. Finally, by the year 1984, "NHTSA proposed that automatic restraint systems be required in new vehicles unless two-thirds of the U.S. population was covered by a mandatory seatbelt law by September 1989" (www.prevention ). Since then, many more seatbelt laws and regulations have been passed. For example, anyone under the age of 18 in New Hampshire must wear a seatbelt, or else the driver will be fined. .
Since 1989, highway fatalities have been declining, mostly due to the use of seat belts. Forty-eight of the fifty states have seat belt laws, yet only 9 states have laws in which the driver can be pulled over and fined if themselves, or a passenger is not wearing a seat belt (www.nhtsa.dot.gov). As of this time, seat belt usage is at an all-time high in the United States, with a huge 75 percent of the population wearing their seat belt (www.prevention ). .
There are many reasons that seat belts should be required to wear. Seat belts are your best protection in a crash. They are designed so that the strongest area of your body absorbs the forces in a crash. They also keep you in place so that your head, face and chest are less likely to strike the windshield, dashboard, other vehicle interiors or other passengers. They also keep you from being thrown out of a vehicle (www.carsp.ca). .
Another reason that there should be mandatory seat belt laws is because "Based on the calculations, researchers estimated that 12,178 people died from 1995 through 2002 because states failed to put in place primary seat belt laws" (www.cbsnews.com). For example, of those estimated 12,178 people, the deaths ranged from 33 people in Rhode Island, to 157 people from Massachusetts, all the way to 1,333 people in Florida.
I personally know the value of a seatbelt all too well. ... With all the devastating statistics and laws in many states requiring the use of seatbelts- 1 in 4 Americans still do not wear a seatbelt. ... Simply put- seatbelts save lives. ... People choose not to wear seatbelts for various reasons. ... There is simply no logical reason not to wear a seatbelt. ...
The speech, "Seatbelts: A Habit That Could Save Your Life,?... The main points of Andrew's speech included the National Highway Safety Administration's statistics for seatbelt use, and its effects, extent of seatbelt protection, and reasons why people do not wear seatbelts. ... While discussing seatbelt protection, he mentioned a couple statistics. ... He easily could have been injured just the same, if not more if he were wearing his seatbelt. ... That would have shown that not wearing seatbelts is common and that the people who get in accidents without their seatbelt on, get in...
Nebraska has a secondary law for wearing seatbelts. It was made a mandatory law in 1993 (highwaysafety.org). ... There is a certain way to use your seatbelt. ... In 1967, front seatbelts became mandatory in all cars except for the ones built before 1967 and shoulder belts became mandatory in 1968 (lemurzone.com). ... Perhaps a mandatory law should be kept in place for children under 16 to wear seat belts. ...
Effects of wearing a seatbelt Many people do not realize the effects of wearing a seatbelt in an automobile. ... Seatbelts provide the greatest protection from ejection. ... Although the seatbelt is not guaranteed to save a life, the chance of saving a life is greater than without wearing the seatbelt. ... While seatbelts do occasionally contribute to serious injury or death, wearing a seatbelt significantly increases the chance of survival. ... Each situation is different, and although in some circumstances the seatbelt causes the injury to the person, the injuries from not wearing the seatb...
Seatbelts You might think such an important thing as car safety should be mandatory, well it is now, but 50 or so years ago, seat belts, airbags and front/rear crumple zones were not. Seatbelts were first thought of in the 1930's by US physicians and only in the 1950's did countries require newly built cars to have seatbelts fitted and finally in 1969, 3-point seat belts were mandatory in Australia. ... Well the seatbelt is that unbalanced external force. ... Body A can be the person and body B is the seatbelt. By using Newton's 2nd Law, the force of the impact is less...
When travelling at slow speeds in your car the wearing of a seatbelt has little effect of your body when you brake. ... Your body will be thrown forwards with great force, and your seatbelt will be literally holding you in place. ... With this amount of inertial force it is impossible for anyone not wearing a seatbelt to stay in his or her seat. ... Those with their seatbelts on may suffer small abrasions and haematomas (bruising.) ...
When traveling at slow speeds in your car the wearing of a seatbelt has little effect of your body when you brake. ... Your body will be thrown forwards with great force, and your seatbelt will be literally holding you in place. ... With this amount of inertial force it is impossible for anyone not wearing a seatbelt to stay in his or her seat. ... Those with their seatbelts on may suffer small abrasions and haematomas (bruising.) ...
The study found that mandatory minimums reduced national cocaine usage by 13 kilograms, while conventional enforcement reduced use by 27 kilograms, and treatment reduced use by 100 kilograms.2 So from an economic perspective, long mandatory sentences are more costly. ... But these facts hardly make up for the costs, both monetary and societal, that mandatory minimums induce. Mandatory minimum sentencing can be done properly. ... The problem isn't mandatory minimums. ... I just wonder how long it will be before mandatory minmums start producing results. ...
