Discuss and evaluate the process model of Communication
The process model of communications is a basic yet fundamental model for communication studies. Through its simplistic nature we are able to reproduce understandings of the mass media (Sinclair, 2002) and how messages signalled, delivered, decoded and received to individuals (Schirato & Yell, 1996). However, this model of communication fails to acknowledge the complexities of the communication process, leading to flaws in the model. This essay will discuss; what the transmission model is, to what degree is it effective? Whether or not the model works in practice and alternative ways the process can function more smoothly according to Schirato and Yell. This will also be written in reference to the radio and telephone. The process model of communications was originally designed from various American theories to improve and explain communication practices within large organisations (Schirato and Yell,1996), hence is quite capable of explaining mass communication (Thompson, 1997). This theory was then translated into a form that applied to everyday and media culture. This model took shape in the form of a sender, a message and a receiver.
Cultural literacy can be defined as both knowledge of meaning systems and an ability to negotiate those systems within different cultural contexts (Schirato and Yell, 1996). It can be concluded from the prior statement that meaning systems are something which are acquired and not hereditary, an Anglo-Saxon born in Australia who moved to China at a very early age may not be accustomed to Australian meaning systems yet fluent in Chinese meaning systems. In relation to modern day radio or telephone conversations, how can meaning be interpreted if the receiver can not understand one another, either through language barriers or different cultural customs? Another example is in the German tradition if someone tells you, you look terrible today; it is a sign of affection as they are generally concerned with you and your situation. If the same were said in Australian society people may possibly become offended and totally interpret the wrong meaning.The transmission model of communication is deeply flawed in theory as it does not incorporate the relationship between the communication and culture; meaning is context specific and cultural literacy into it structure and obviously fails to identify certain aspects of communication such as misunderstanding. The transmission model also does not account for the fact that people are different from one another in terms of; gender, sexual preference, age, religion, occupation, wealth, political affiliation, entertainment interests, social values, ethnicity, educational qualifications and cross cultural experiences (Schirato and Yell, 1996). A diff
Some topics in this essay:
Schirato Yell,
Kress Kress,
Wall Kruger,
,
Schirato Yell1996,
schirato yell,
model communication,
schirato yell 1996,
yell 1996,
transmission model,
meaning systems,
meaning context,
cultural literacy,
communication culture,
relationship communication,
relationship communication culture,
meaning context specific,
context specific cultural,
communication process,
communication culture meaning,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1076
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Discuss and evaluate the process model of Communication Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|