Euthanasia in Society
The word euthanasia is derived from the Greek word "eu" for good and "thantos" which means death and originally referred to intentional mercy killing. But the word it euthanasia has acquired a more complex meaning in modern times. Proponents of euthanasia believe that a dying patient has the right to end their suffering and leave the world in a dignified manner. Those who contest euthanasia believe that man does not have the right to end another person's life no matter what pain they endure. Euthanasia is one of the most important public policy issues being debated today. The outcome of debate will profoundly affect family relationships, interaction between doctors and patients, and concepts of basic morality. The word euthanasia has acquired a complex meaning in modern times. There are several types of euthanasia and one must define them in order to avoid confusion. Passive euthanasia is the process of hastening the death of a person by withdrawing some form of support and letting nature take its course. Such an act would include removing life-support equipment, stopping medical procedures, stopping food and water and allowing the person to die. Active euthanasia involves causing the death of a person through a direct act
Pro-euthanasia believers think that the patient has the right to end their life when it is known that there will not be any recovery and death is imminent. They believe that a human being has the right to die in dignity and a painless death rather than suffer endlessly knowing full well that they will not recover. Those that are anti-euthanasia have many reasons for their position. One reason is because euthanasia is contrary to Christian ethics. Many religious groups within Christian, Muslim, Jewish and other religions believe that God gave life and therefore only God should take away life. Suicide would then be considered as a rejection of God's sovereignty and loving plan. They feel that we are all masters of our own lives, but that suicide should never be an option. In my opinion I think the Netherlands has taken a positive step towards a better way of life for many people, they have set out guidelines for which people that have no hope and are in an unacceptable state of suffering can speed up the rate of their death. I believe that the consultation of two doctors and a review is the appropriate process as to make sure that some are not “taking the easy way out”. But if a person really is in a state of pain, agony and no hope what is the point of making this person suffer more than she or he already has. In my opinion that is what is really inhumane. In the Netherlands, the administration practice is an injection to render the patient comatose, followed by a second injection to stop the heart. Official guidelines encourage the doctor to allow the patient to take the lethal dosage, under supervision, if this is a practical alternative.
Some topics in this essay:
Burial Act,
,
City Sparta,
Muslim Jewish,
Medical Association,
Ministry Justice,
Greece Rome,
word euthanasia,
acquired complex meaning,
meaning modern times,
Dutch Medical,
Royal Dutch,
euthanasia acquired complex,
acquired complex,
complex meaning,
modern times,
meaning modern,
royal dutch medical,
euthanasia acquired,
word euthanasia acquired,
royal dutch,
district attorney,
official guidelines,
medical examiner,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1122
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Euthanasia in Society Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|