Organizational Behaviour
The first case involves a consulting firm by the name of Conavia. Conavia, which is located in Vancouver, specializes in avionics and primarily functions as a tall mechanistic organization which deals specialization of skills. Stanley Jackson who is the senior Vice President for the Economics of Finance at Conavia performs his duties under the shadow of George Markov, who was the founder. Conavia uses a vertical method of management in which one person is in control of everyone else below. They employ 9 workers who directly report to Vice President Stanley Jackson. Furthermore, Conavia also incorporates a high degree of formalization in which strict rules dictate on what and how things are supposed to be done. This type of a recipe results in Conavia’s employees having limited discretion over the way in which they carry out their responsibilities. Apart from having a vertical management structure, Conavia also uses a highly centralized system where the majority of decisions are made at the top by George George. The somewhat allows a degree of autonomy between the vice presidents, however very little. Due to the fact that the organization maintains a tall hierarchal system, the degree of complexity, is limited as superi
After the hiring of two additional people (Starke and Gilbert) the company’s department structure became quite different from the overall organization. There seems to be more of a superior subordinate relation, as final decision were now being made by the department’s head manager. The approach seems to be somewhat of a mixture of organic and mechanistic structures. It is more of a tall structure with certain employees reporting to different manager and the manager reporting to the director of the department. The span of control became narrow though decision making was still decentralized and the degree of formalization was kept to a minimum. This is party due to the fact that decisions were always needed to be made by the department that deals with creativity and design. Also, the complexity of the department was still simple since they were only focusing on jobs that pertain to their department. It is also obvious that the company’s forms of communication were different. Ridgeway Furniture Limited used more of an open door policy which allowed employees to express their ideas freely and feel comfortable approaching their superior. While Conavia, who used more of a downward communication system told his employees what to do and how to do it. Employees had no say in decision making and that made them feel more like a number rather than a human being. When comparing both approaches it is evident that Ridgeway Furniture Limited’s open door approach seems to be more effective in meeting their employee’s needs. They provided an environment that made employees feel more comfortable and were able to express themselves in regards to problems that they were having as a result of the changes in the structure in the creative department. They did not have to sit and watch and do whatever they were told to do as in Conavia.
Some topics in this essay:
Furniture Limited,
George George,
Gilbert Starke,
Conavia Ridgeway,
Furthermore George,
Gilbert Starkes,
Starke Gilbert,
Furniture Limited’s,
Conavia George,
Furthermore Conavia,
leadership skills,
ridgeway furniture,
gilbert starke,
ridgeway furniture limited,
furniture limited,
failed provide,
lack communication,
president company,
according maslow’s theory,
maslow’s theory,
self actualization,
motivational level,
feel contributing overall,
president economics finance,
direct interactions carson,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 2802
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Organizational Behaviour Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|