The Evolution of the Post-Development Theory

.
             Escobar concluded his article recognizing that for post-development to be a socially effective tool depends on how we assess the current state of modernity. He posits that we are moving beyond the paradigm of modernity, both epistemologically and socially. Therefore, there is a need to move beyond the antiquated thinking in terms of the Euro-centric development and modernity. .
             Jan Pieterse offers his criticism of post-development as "flawed premises" on their positions. In breaking down the component elements of post-development, he questions whether this perspective is truly fruitful and tenable. .
             While he acquiesces to the criticisms of development – as many others have pointed out the same issues, the problem with this view is the rhetoric and posturing. Some of his arguments against post-development is the acknowledgement of development arising not just from Western developed societies, but also from the South or even East (Japan). Furthermore, post-development disregards the success of those countries in East Asia where development has been touted as a development miracle. .
             What he takes particular offense to is the notion of "alternatives to development," precisely because no post-development theorist provides concrete alternatives. Despite all the criticisms post-development writers have expressed, they fall short in providing actual alternatives and remain in the realm of critique, which does nothing to actually change the current status quo of development. Moreover, by focusing on the local and community level and putting this ideal on a pedestal, post-development can result in the unintended consequence of reification of the local community, presenting a narrow view of globalization. .
             In this chapter of Exploring Post-development, Ziai narrows down the criticisms shared by most critics of post-development into an uncritical stance towards local communities and cultural tradition, rejection of modernity and its positive advances, concealment or ignorance of oppression legitimized as cultural tradition, having the same authoritarian notions as development, and lack of legitimate alternatives.