However, Israel may be forced to accept this deal after all if there are no better options. The third possible outcome is that Iran can go ahead against all adversaries to test the weapon which both the United States and Israel have absolutely declared unacceptable although the writer points out a fact that if Iran does, all other states will move on eventually as they have always done in the past. The writer also debunks some of the fears by the international community on Iran. One is that Iran government has been tagged as being irrational in its policies and beliefs. Waltz quickly points out that any right thinking government will not be as irrational as formulating policies that will lead to her own extinction as in the misuse of the weapon. Also, there is an uncertainty as to if Iran will not use the weapon against her enemies, with Israel being first point of call. Waltz as well reiterates the fact that Iran is not likely to do that knowing full well that Israel also is capable of heavy retaliation. Analysts also point out that having a nuclear weapon, Iran may be more vulnerable and less careful which may result to the weapons getting to the hands of terrorists whether intentionally or not. Waltz also debunks that claim as it is expected that any state embarking on this would not be as careless knowing the dangers attached to this weapons and even the terrorists themselves. In all, Waltz posits that trying to stop Iran at this present age and disposition is not the real deal. He emphasizes that a balance is required in the Arab region just as we have in other regions of the world. Hence, the acquisition of nuclear powers will not lead to proliferation of weapons, rather it would only create a balance and most likely reduce the possibility of the outbreak of war and there has never been any serious war between two nuclear powers.
Furthermore, on the speech delivered by the Prime Minister of Israel, Mr.