Once that power to protect us fails, however, the individual is returned to a state of nature, and regains the liberty to protect himself as circumstances dictate. .
Anything that reduces sovereign power in any way tends, in Hobbes" reading of the political process, to undermine the commonwealth, and he is adamant that power must never be distributed across various individuals or institutions within the state. Separation of power equates to weakness in Hobbes" model of government. It is the sovereign's duty to ensure that such division never occurs, and he would be going against that duty if he were to transfer any of the rights he holds on behalf of the nation at large to any others. The minute that sovereign power is divided we are at risk of sliding back "to the greatest evil that can happen in this life" - the state of nature. All of Hobbes" efforts as a political theorist are directed towards the prevention of that evil, and he can see no alternative to the absolutist prescriptions that he makes. Hobbes seems to view the bulk of mankind as largely irrational in its political behavior, unable to see where its own best interests lie and only too easily seduced by the evils of the state of nature. Consequently, human nature must be endlessly and very strictly governed by a sovereign power. .
Given that the state of nature is a state of permanent insecurity, the sovereign must also have the last word in the matter of scriptural interpretation, by linking scriptural authority to law. Hobbes" discourse of political sovereignty states that any pact made between God and his chosen people has long since lapsed and therefore, demolishment of the Church's claim to have any significant role to play in the state. This is not a theological problem per se for Hobbes, but a political one, requiring a political solution. Only an absolute sovereign can prevent the decline into anarchy that such scriptural disputes inevitable generate.