It has also been touted that if unchecked global warming could also cause the air to be hotter and filled with disease.
Sounds bad, well what if they are terms that are meant to sound bad? Does that mean that they are real issues that require our attention and that there are real problems that we should try to solve in a global arena. The problem is that the cure will be tougher the longer we wait (Roleff 123). The Green Group believes we can do little things to help by writing 101 Ways to Save Money and Save Our Planet: reach for a fly swatter instead of bug spray (29); use natural sponges to clean with instead of polyurethane sponges (44); or carpool to work or school(54). .
I have to admit that a global problem pulls a lot of people together for one great cause. The greenhouse effect has caused people to panic, activists to rally, and governments to spend millions. But does it really exist? According to Roleff the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) announced the earth has entered into a climatic instability (48). The opposite view is that the government has used it as a buzzword to blacken already cloudy issues for the general public. It has allowed the politicians to create a shroud over dark and muddled legalese that no one can read and has helped to rally constituent support for unrelated laws by labeling them with it. That shroud as used by politicians can hide many other issues and reasons for spending with one term, "Greenhouse."" .
This is a different view than most when you think of the global warming issue. There are several well-known authors and researchers that believe the issue has been misleading and have tried to get their view out for the world to hear, but it has been to modest avail. John L. Daly from Britain has been working for years on the greenhouse effect and has come to some intriguing conclusions. To paraphrase Daly,.
I have lived through the `ice age' of the 1970's, the `nuclear winter' of the 1980s, and now the `global warming' scare of the present.