Closely relating to this premise, one must also assume that parents value education and take a sincere and active interest in their child's development. .
This leads to another assumption involving the schools themselves. Schools are faced with the burden of limited space. In order to achieve absolute choice, schools must have adequate room to accommodate new students whom wish to enroll. School choice is also faced with private discretion. Private schools, unlike public schools, have the ability to deny enrollment because of lack of ability. Upon choosing a privatized education we must also assume that private schools will accept all applicants, just as public schools are required. .
Are school vouchers the answer to improving public education? Unfortunately the jury still appears to be out. Several studies have been conducted which lead to contrasting outcomes. The political bias behind these studies seems to be a determining element in assessing the success of the voucher system. Recent studies have focused on the academic achievement of students who use voucher opposed to those who remain in a public school. Some findings conclude that vouchers students see significant gains while others indicate minimal or no improvement. .
Voucher programs have been evaluated in San Antonio, Indianapolis, Milwaukee, Cleveland, and New York City. The only instance in which a randomized field was selected for distribution of vouchers was New York City. Other cities have accepted voucher applications on a first-come, first-served basis. These reports tend to show positive improvements in quality of education, although families who are quick to respond happen to be the families most interested in their child's education. Therefore, studies in these areas are severely contaminated compared to a randomized process (Peterson, 4).
New York City is perhaps the most reliant study we can look to for answers.