Over the past twelve years, Saddam Hussein has been a nuisance to not only the United States, but the entire world. An invasion of Iraq is long overdue and well-deserved; the United States should wage war with Iraq to dispose of this irritant once and for all.
Following the Iran-Iraq war, Kuwait, who funded the majority of the war on Iraq's part, demanded that their war debt be paid back in full. With most of Iraq's profit coming from oil, and oil-prices being low at the moment, Saddam Hussein accused Kuwait of flooding the market to put pressure on Iraq. Thus begins the Persian Gulf War. Thinking that the United States had no part in the issue, Saddam invaded Kuwait on August 2, 1990; easily overpowering the small gulf state. After the United Nations set deadline for Iraqi withdrawal of Kuwait expired, the United States launched a massive air assault on Iraq. After the air attack, the ground war was launched and the Gulf War was easily won by February of 1991.
Sadly the Gulf War did little to suppress Saddam Hussein's evil ways. On top of hiring nuclear physicists from the old USSR and Pakistan, in 1993 he also tested biological weapons on the "Kurds", Iraq's largest non-Arab ethnic minority. The hiring of these nuclear physicists could lead to what is known as miniaturization. Miniaturization is a method to reduce the physical size of nuclear bombs. Meaning for example, one could leave a briefcase in an airport and cause some major damage. In addition to this possible terrorist element, Iraq has also been accused of harboring terrorists from the Al Qaeda networks. However, Saddam adamantly denies this accusation, saying that Iraq funded the "Kurds", the very people they bombed around a decade ago, with weapons and technology to fight against the terrorist organization. This however, is a lie. .
After Iraq was forced out of Kuwait in 1991, Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi government agreed to a series of commitments, termed Resolutions by the U.
The war with Iraq was instigated by the attacks on America on Sept 11th. The attacks on America caused a fear of terrorism that had to be dealt with. ... After the attacks on September 11th the American people were looking for justice. ... His threat just became more apparent with the attacks of September 11th. Without the attacks of 9/11 I feel that the United States would have still invaded Iraq sooner or later. ...
What Will Come About In Post-War Iraq? ... They asked us why the United States was taking over Iraq, and whether the Americans would stay in Iraq forever. ... Resentment and suspicion, not gratitude and embrace were what Iraqis felt when American troops invaded Iraq. ... Judith Kipper, director of the Middle East Forum, has suggested that if Saddam Hussein survives the US attack, he might reemerge to lead an underground guerrilla force that fights the US occupation. ... After the al Qaeda attack, he had to pay it heed, but he failed to embrace it fully in Afghanistan. ...
The topic of my persuasive argument is "Should America attack Iraq"? ... It was under his direction that led to the attack of Kuwait, and the murder of many ethnic minorities within Iraq and abroad. ... The argument lies that not only should America attack Iraq but it more importantly has the responsibility to do so. ... Finally, and most importantly, it must be considered, what are the consequences of America attacking Iraq? It is indisputable that by attacking Iraq, many more terrorist groups will turn their attention on America. ...
Because of belligerent attacks by Iraq in 1991, and the development of weapons of mass destruction in 2003, the U.S. has twice intervened militarily in the Persian Gulf, each with similar outcomes. On August 2, 1990 Iraq invaded Kuwait. ... The UN Security Council called for Iraq to withdraw and subsequently embargoed most trade with Iraq. ... Iraq called for terrorist attacks against the coalition and launched Scud missiles at Israel and at Saudi Arabia. ... s invasion of Iraq was Iraq's failure to comply with every U.S. demand. ...
Bush is acting as if he has the right to attack Iraq whenever he feels like it. ... It is against International law, which is quite clear: Country A cannot attack Country B unless Country B has already attacked Country A or is about to attack Country A. Iraq has yet to attack the U.S. Saddam knows that attacking the U.S. would basically be suicidal. ... Actually, if you think about it, under international law, Saddam Hussein has a better case for attacking us than Bush has for attacking them. ...
Why The War On Iraq Was Wrong? ... Rumsfeld was telling his aides to come up with plans for striking Iraq - even though there was no evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the attacks." - CBS NEWS. This is another statement which shows a general grudge against the country and leadership of Iraq, suggesting America would pounce on anything they can use to attack Iraq, most likely because they see Iraq as a potential threat due to the wealth (oil) but there is no evidence to go buy, and I feel that America is run by a illiterate "cowboy" who is trying to finish of what his farther h...
In order to restore order and create a democracy in Iraq , the United States is planning to form a new Iraqi Army. ... I for one , agree with this idea to form a new Iraqi army. ... The United States sees this as a great opportunity to stop the violence and the constant attacks on U.S troops. ... Even though the war is now over , American soldiers are still being attacked and killed. But with a newly formed Iraqi army trained by United States personnel , the violence among the Iraqi people and soldiers would probably die down. ...
The Debate Over War in Iraq Is the war on Iraq perhaps one of the biggest displays of American hypocrisy? ... After the September 11th attack, many high ranking officials as well as the media asked for a military attack against Iraq similar to the ongoing US military operations in Afghanistan, even though so far there has been no evidence linking the Iraqi regime to the terrorist operations in New York and Washington. ... Under international law a country can attack another country only if it is in immediate danger from that country. A country cannot attack another country if its leader is de...
