Every city is different when you go from state, county to county. Some cities and counties are in rural areas and others in suburban. Why should someone living in middle of nowhere have to abide by the same rules and restrictions as someone in the middle of a hustle and bustle city? For example, a particular city may have a rule that says you can't fire firearms inside the city limits. Why should a little small country town that only has 100 people living in it have to abide by the same rule when there is miles and miles between houses and other buildings? One thing that all "pro gun" people agree on is that gun control should not mean eliminating the ownership of a gun. Another thing that most of these people agree on is that our existing laws are not enforced like they should be (nationalissues.com). If we would enforce these laws, laws of ownership for example, the way that they are meant to be enforced, a lot of our problems would be solved. Guns don't kill; people do.
The other point of view, the supporters of gun control, believes that we should have stricter laws referring to ownership and regulation of firearms. These people believe that denying ownership of a firearm will decline the number of murders, considering "approximately 70% of murders are committed with firearms" (www.angelfire.com). The majority of these people are totally different from the people who are against gun control because they do not have a passion for guns. They d, however, respect others that do have a passion for them. Their question is "why can't the guns be kept at a gun club of some sort under sign out regulations"? This way the guns can still be used for sporting reasons but are out of the reach of children. Another point of view from these people is that most guns that are used in crimes were originally purchased legally and most of the crimes committed were crimes of rage and passion (anglefire.
