Human cloning is an emerging science in which genetic material is altered and manipulated in various ways in order to modify the characteristics of an organism. This new technology has been met with both acceptance and disbelief. Some people believe that human cloning is beneficial to our society and will open up a vast new world. There are, however, serious concerns that human cloning could tragically effect our society which many people fail to recognize: clones could suffer an identity crisis, no emotional family ties would be made between the clone and its parents, parents may view the clone as a product and not a true human being, scientists in a sense would be “playing the role of God,” possibilities for a uniformed society would be in effect, and if taken to the highest extreme parents would eventually be able to create and design their own children. How then, knowing of all the drawbacks of human cloning, can we convince scientists to rethink their cloning fantasies and introduce them to the possible dangers and controversies human clones would bring to our society? Human cloning is an immoral act and would only cause tragedy and turmoil for our nati

Another argument that is against human cloning is the fact that the human clones would have no real value in life because they would be used at the convenience of doctors and other medical officials to provide patients with the clone’s “spare organs” in case of a needed transplant. While human cloning might not offer great benefits to humanity, no one has completely stated a case in which it would do any real harm, states Ruth Macklin, a professor of bioethics at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York. Some people ask why human cloning should be banned altogether when there are several methods that scientists think would benefit certain medical needs of society. Robert Wachbroit, a research scholar at the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy, highlights on an advantageous aspect of human cloning, organ transplants. He states that humans will be allowed to clone themselves in order to have “spare parts” in case of an organ failure later on in life (67). Because of the slim chances in finding a compatible donor, one would think that cloning would be ideal for these people. But, did anyone stop to think about the consequences that might occur if allowed this freedom? Having a spare clone might seem like a good idea for this particular purpose, but then again this opens up a branch of disputes about what to do with the clone once the organs have been removed. Has society given thought to the ethical issues behind this procedure? Is there a devised plan of deposition for the clones? If so, where would they go? What would become of them? Would these “spare bodies” be buried in a special place? Would they be burned to ashes or would they be frozen for later use? If these false procedures were in effect, would they be portrayed as a type of man-slaughter or just an unconscious act of discard? These are serious issues that should be taken into deep consideration before cloning rights are passed. Society needs to carefully scrutinize these strenuous possibilities and they should not be handled lightheartedly. There has yet been anyone to set up adequate procedures concerning “spare clones”. There needs to be definite established rules and regulations regarding the use of clones in transplant procedures. If there were no abiding laws, cloning would go beyond the realms in which it belongs and could possibly cause major destruction to our society. If merely anyone was free to do whatever they wish with this new technology our world would be placed in great danger. The possibility for someone to create a uniform society would be in effect. This means that a person who wanted to clone him/herself or someone numerous times in attempt to create an “equal” world would have the opportunity to do so with the discovery of this new profound technology. The last time an attempt was made to create a perfect world was during the reign of the Nazi leader Adolf Hitler. Hitler demanded that all people of his so called “perfect race” were to have blond hair and blue eyes. All others were to be killed in an effort to wipe out their existence on earth. If human cloning had been established back then, Hitler most likely would have used this method to conform his race instead of using Ayranian men and women for breeding (Lester 59). There are still people alive today who are searching for their perfect world and would stop at nothing to produce one. Society should take strict precautions in order to prevent a “master race” from rising again in the near future.

Cloning experiments have been around for many years, but just recently a proposal for human cloning ha

Some topics in this essay:
Disaster Human, Public Policy, Allen Verhey, Archbishop York, God God, Leon Kass, Hitler Hitler, Daniel Callahan, Cindy Crawford, Julie Johnson, human cloning, human clones, cloned children, cloning human, person cloned, human cloning human, cloned child, cloning scientists, human cloning banned, true human, person cloning, human cloning scientists, parents love, believe human cloning, human cloning offer,