1. Free Speech and Pornography
... ) was found unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court because it was too vague and broad to effectively control pornography on the Internet (2). Meeks claims that the CDA would have restricted free speech by equating the terms "obscenity,"" which implies sexually graphic material, and "indecency,"" which is much more broadly defined, and includes anything that one deems offensive (2). Therefore, according to Meeks ... , the law would have forced legitimate Internet journalists to censor their speech in order to avoid negative repercussions. Further, it would have threatened other types of ...
- Word Count: 816
- Approx Pages: 3
- Has Bibliography
- Grade Level: Undergraduate