1. Position Paper on the Use of Dynamite
The act itself is so exceptionally hazardous that the doing of it imposes an absolute duty to protect the public from any harm, regardless of any carelessness or negligence on the part of the actor. For example, the intentional use of explosives to excavate gives rise to an absolute liability for any injury occasioned as a result." (1971) 26 Ohio St. 2d 146. COUNTER-ARGUEMENT One possible argument Gravel could make is that it is immune to liability as a State contractor. ... As a reason for denying the extension of immunity to the contractor, the Ohio Supreme Court cited the court in Whitney...
- Word Count: 738
- Approx Pages: 3