Example Essays Home
FAQ
Acceptable Use Policy
Tech Support
LOG IN!
Click HERE for Instant Access
 
This is a free preview of the paper.
Join Now
Log In
  

Language And Communication In Elementary Mathematics Teaching

Somewhere between Vygotsky and Piaget; somewhere between Newton determining the laws of the universe alone with his apple tree, and Andrew Wiles proving Fermat’s last theorem with the aid of his colleagues around the world; somewhere between learning the 3Rs by rote under a strict schoolmaster beating down the slightest whisper, and the neo-pragmatist’s ‘knowledge is conversation’ ideal mathematics lesson of total discourse; somewhere between these opposite ends of their various spectra lies the true role of language and conversation in the mathematics class. If it is the responsibility of the mathematics teacher to encourage students to talk in the classroom (Steele, 1998) then it is more so the responsibility to ensure that that discussion does not damage students’ mathematical learning (Sfard et al, 1998).

Orey (1998) proposes that learning mathematics makes powerful problem solvers who can break down complex problems into understandable elements and create clear effective and even original solutions. Successful mathematics students, according to Schielack (2000), can read critically, identify fallacies, detect bias, assess risk and suggest alternative solutions. Cotton (1999) postulates thus that mat


¨ Inference – predictions or generalisations to start off with;

¨ Polysemy, where a word may have two or more similar meanings (such as the openings in either a river or ones face suggested by the word mouth);

The language of mathematics and diversity

Sfard et al (1998), however, ask for the research to support this to be conducted first. Indeed, reflection may be just as important as articulation. The neo-pragmatist activities that promote student understanding are those that allow less mental privacy and more communicative skills (Secada & Berman, 1999). Biggs (1987, in McInerney & McInerney, 1998) suggests Chinese students are ahead of Western students in terms of their ability to reflect and problem solve, because of greater individual work giving the student time to construct their knowledge and assume responsibility for their learning (Secada & Berman, 1999).

Some topics in this essay:
Durkin Shire, Gibbs Orton, Andrew Wiles, Mathematics Teachers, Conclusion Sfard, McInerney McInerney, Yackel Cobb’s, Historically Euro-restrictive, Authors Wickett, Whereas Piaget, et al, gibbs orton 1994, gibbs orton, orton 1994, al 1998, sfard et al, et al 1998, sfard et, orey 1998, roberts nd, steele 1998, language mathematics, durkin shire 1991, mcinerney mcinerney 1998, shire 1991,

Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 2119
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on Language And Communication In Elementary Mathematics Teaching


Professional Papers:
Teaching Foreign Language The purpose of this paper is to ad2390 words
Importance of Teaching Foreign Language2414 words
TEACHING A FOREIGN LANGUAGE ampamp COMPUTERS3172 words
Second Language Instruction2022 words
Real World Mathematics1360 words
A comparion of Elementary Schools:Performance and Income6648 words



Student Written Papers:
Methods/ Mathematics5657 words
The Effects of Standardize Testing on NonNative English Tea3267 words
Mainstreaming1108 words
Howard Gardner2052 words
Prop 2273729 words

Look at even more essays on Language And Communication In Elementary Mathematics Teaching
More Politics Essays

Join Now
(Credit Card)
Join Now
(Online Check)
Join Now
(Phone 1-900)



CUSTOMER SERVICES




Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Essays
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Book Notes

 

 


All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright © 2002-2009 ExampleEssays.com DMCA
Saved Papers