Pablo picasso

"œThey now pinned less faith on the power of new subject matter and strove to complement their colour divisionism with fragmentation of the cubist sort- Suprematism was influenced by cubism because of it geometric shapes but "suprematism was not so much a movement in art as it is an attitude - This non-movement was created by Kasmir Malevich's , "His elemental forms were designed both to break the artist's conditioned responses to his environment and create new realities no less significant then the realities of nature herself'- A suprematist work, banishes every trace of subject, it used color and form and there interaction to form a subject
             While cubism had definite subject it was also the interaction of color and shape that made the subject. Constructivism was influenced by suprematism, this movement swept away traditional notions about art, believing that it should imitate the forms and processes of modern technology. "Often constructivism was overtly propagandist in nature: sometimes by the placement of simple geometric forms in the kind of literary context which turns such forms into representations - (Constructivism 161). De Stijl was mostly influenced by painters Piet Mondrian, Theo Van Doesburg and architect Gerrit Rietveld. These men believed that art should strive towards complete harmony, order clarity in a constant process of refinement. The works in this movement were of course geometrical, using mainly square forms. The movement's forms were deeply philosophical and were rooted in the idea that art should in some way reflect order. All of these movements progressed from cubism (hence my title); they developed from shapes into other worldly meanings. They all branched out to their own ways and fell to their feelings and desirers. All of these movements developed from geometrical objects to seem as a true form such as a body or face then turn into a geometrical form.