Does it save the taxpayers money to execute someone? ... Could the use of lethal injection and other forms of execution be used to help save taxpayers money? Some people say that more people should be put to death to save taxpayers money. ... So if someone was for the death penalty just to save money then they should be against it. ...
There are many reasons why the death penalty should be used, but the three most important are that it deters potential murderers from committing crimes, it saves our government money in the long run, and most importantly, it guarantees that these convicted murderers will not kill again. ... The death penalty also saves the government money in the long run. ... When a convicted killer is given life without parole, the appeals made by attorneys on both sides, as well as appeals by the court and the judges involved, add up to millions of dollars our government wastes every year, not to mention mo...
Capital punishment save money. ... Those who favor capital punishment say that why to keep a murderer in prison and feed him for the rest of his life from out taxpayers money. ... Executing each of these inmates would have saved 821 lives." (Sharp) There is direct proof that the death penalty does save lives. ... Being more cautious would save lives and keep it safer. ...
In California, our most populous state, it is estimated that taxpayers could have saved $90 million annually by abolishing the death penalty(61). ... Now, it's based on how much money people have. ... All because one has the money to get a good lawyer and the other has to take a law-appointed lawyer. ... Innocent lives will be saved. ... Unknowingly, we as a whole pay for the killing of others, through the money we pay for taxes. ...
-California spends three times more money on its prisoners ($18,724/year) than it does on its students ($5,739/year). ... Alternatives -If California replaced the death penalty with a sentence of Life Without Parole, the state would save more than $90 milllion a year. ... -This money could be spent on schools, drug prevention programs, job training centers, after shcool programs, roads, or day care facilites; measures which truly prevent crime and make our neighborhoods safer. ...
From a money standpoint many people say that the death penalty saves money for taxpayers due to reduced court and imprisonment fees (Warren 1). ... They would have to come up with money to support all of their daily needs that taxpayers had once paid thousands of dollars for (Warren 1). ... Its better to kill a few criminals in order to save hundreds of other innocent people by giving the criminals a fear of death. ... Even if only one life a year is saved through mental healing, that is a great accomplishment in the eyes of our God. ...
Doctors, the people that are supposed to save life are destroying life. ... This suggests that by killing every murderer, money can be saved! ... Think of the money that could be saved by the government! ... If we are not saving money, crime statistics show that capital punishment does not have an impact on crime, and in our religion it was abolished two millennias ago, then why should we have the death penalty? ...
Another reason I support the death penalty is because I think it is a terrible waste of money to have to support criminals for the rest of their life in prison. They are the last people who should deserve our taxpayer's hard-earned money. It makes me angry to know that part of the money I am making at work is going to pay for the food some criminal is eating right now, the light that is shining in his cell, and the water he uses to brush his teeth, shower, or flush the toilet with. ... That is how our taxpayer money can be saved, and as a result, be put to better use on someone who is ...
The family ended up settling with the burglar for a ridiculous sum of money for the hardship the burglar had endured. ... Without any worries, no bills or money collectors, and on behalf of the tax paying citizens, you can go see a movie while eating popcorn in a movie theater, play video games, and participate in countless other activities while enjoying peace of mind. ... Then finally the average taxpayer could enjoy a little more of their hard earned money and save us the trouble of giving it away. ... The government wastes too much time and money in the processes of appeals for...
It has been estimated that California could save as much as $90 million a year if they abolish the death penalty. In New York $118 million could be saved, more then any other state. Other states that could also save money include New Jersey $16 million annually, Kansas 11.4 million annually and Indiana $5 million annually. ... Money is of no value in jail. ...
Socrates calmly debates with each friend over the moral value and justification of such an act. "...people who do not know you and me will believe that I might have saved you if I had been willing to give money, but that I did not care." ... Also, if Socrates does not follow the plan, many people would assume that his friends did not care about him enough to help him escape or that his friends are not willing to give their time or money in order to help him. ... Socrates" conclusion to stay in the prison may have cost him his life, but saved the morality and truth of Athens. ...
The proposed safeguards will cost a huge pile of money, money that the government doesn't have. ... The proposed safeguards will cost a huge pile of money, money that the government doesn't have. ... Passing a law requiring this-or-that in the criminal justice system won't make the money magically appear. ...
The suspect demands money and release of his friends from jail. ... "Won't we do anything to the extortionist to the save the passengers (1)?" ... According to Levin's first reasoning, if a person demands money and release of his friends from jail, Levin does not explain how somebody would go about finding this person wherever he is hiding. ... Levin says, "Surely we can, we must, do anything to the extortionist to save the passengers. (1). ... He also predicts that someday soon, many lives will be threatened, and torture will be the only way to save them. ...
Simpson case; everyone knows he was guilty, but since he has so much money and fame he was let free. If he didn't have all that money he"d be put to death for sure because he was a black man and he killed a white woman. ... But with the death penalty it would be too late to save those innocent people who get caught up in crimes they didn't commit. ...
I am strongly against the death penalty because it costs the taxpayers too much money, the possible "wrongly accused," it is cruel and unusual punishment, and the issue of capital punishment being a deterrent. The first reason the death penalty should be done away with is that it costs the taxpayers too much money. ... Why spend taxpayers" money keeping these inmates in jail for so long? ... Taxpayers" money should go to better society, not to accommodate the prisoners that are going to end up in the electric chair or getting lethal injection. ... The American society knows too m...
How would it feel if a close sibling, friend, or even a parent were murdered? And for punishment their murderer were given food and a place to stay all on the account of the tax money? One would probably agree that the death penalty is the only way to punish this killer. One should also agree then t...
The movie shows that if you have money and can provide a good defense for yourself than you can be acquitted of murder, just like Matthew Ponsulate's accomplice. ... Even if that one mistaken person out of a hundred criminals were killed, many more lives could still possibly be saved by making sure the other ninety-nine cannot attack again. ...
It has been estimated that California could save as much as $90 million a year if they abolish the death penalty. In New York $118 million could be saved, more then any other state. Other states that could also save money include New Jersey $16 million annually, Kansas 11.4 million annually and Indiana $5 million annually (Prothrow-Stith, 134). ...
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT Hundreds of murderers are put into jail and then let out several years later. They say they have learned their lesson, yet when they get out they commit more crimes, and end up back in jail. The only way to make sure these murderers don't commit more crimes is by capital pun...
Deterrence Leslie Cantu: Fear of death deters people from committing crimes, proponents say. They also believe that if attached to certain crimes, the penalty of death exerts a positive moral influence by placing a stigma on certain crimes like manslaughter, resulting in attitudes of disgust and horror to such acts. Furthermore, retentionists insist that the deterrent influence of the death penalty reaches across state lines into jurisdictions that have abolished it, and so all benefit by its continued use. Perhaps this is the intended goal of the Violent Crime Control And Law Enforcement Ac...
Estimates say that California could save over $90,000,000 per year. ... This is an enormous amount of money being wasted to barbarically punish our criminals. ... Delays in the action and radical court decisions force this process to drag out thus costing the state and nation a greater amount of money to carry out its policy on capital punishment. ...
The questions of fact concerning capital punishment fall into three general areas: does capital punishment save money? ... Those who favor capital punishment say that why to keep murder in prison and feed him for the rest of his life from out taxpayers money. ...
Not only based on race, but it is also based on the amount of money in your wallet. ... Those without money cannot hire adequate lawyers to defend their case. ... James 4:12 says, "There is only one lawgiver and judge, he who is able to save and to destroy. ...
