In most places, for a war to be socially accepted, the reasons for entering into the war must be defensive and for the security of the country. ... Engaging in war is what the majority's opinion feels is necessary to protect and maintain the security of our country. ... This will damage the security of America, both for its military and its citizens. ... As Americans, we take for granted the every day security with which we have in our everyday lives. In order to maintain this security, some action must be taken against Iraq. ...
A pure evil terrorism is, it is a threat to global peace and its security. ... Many times it is for national security, global security, or to aid foreign countries. ... Also, the Senate and House of Representatives passed clauses that authorized "use of force in Iraq" in response to Hussein's denial of UN Security Resolutions. The two main reasons in the defied Security Council for waging the war were that Saddam renewed unauthorized combat in his country and also he betrayed the truce set during the Gulf War. ...
Three of her body guards also were injured, according to a security guard at the al-Yarmouk facility. An Iraqi security official said al-Hashimi was brought to the hospital at about 10:30 a.m. and immediately was taken to surgery for a bullet wound in the left side of her abdomen. ... Members of al-Hashimi's security detail said the attack was carried out by men in two new SUVs. ... Mohammed Abdul Ghany, a security official at al-Yarmouk Hospital, said the search for the attackers was under way. ... During the patrol, tanks swept through residential areas, occasion...
An important event is happening in the Salah ad Din Province. 13 local police stations are opening their doors soon. The first of which just opened to the joy of those in the area. Many came for the event, even though there was a dust storm in the area, and watched as the doors were opened to the...
"Victory" in Iraq! (propagandized) Today coalition forces easily finished off the last of the anti-American Saddam loyalist in Baghdad. This brings the end to a reign of terror and dictatorship in one part of the Middle East. The people of Iraq were thrilled to see the American troops coming t...
Lastly actually a major hit that this generation would take would be on housing as the mortgage prices will increase as it is not enough to pay thousand in student loans; However we will definitely see the error of our way when our generation is 55 and paying outrageous taxes to make up for today's tax cuts to the rich when we turn 70 and realize we have no Social Security when our life savings are being used to pay for the mistakes of today's government. ... Reforming in the area where we lack the most like social security and Medicare and war spending. ...
He described why the use of force is not only warranted, but it is also obligatory, and that Saddam Hussein is a real and impending threat to our security. ... One person who backs the president's plan is Secretary of State Colin Powell, who is going to the United Nations on February 5 to share intelligence with its Security Council about Saddam Hussein not accounting for many biological and chemical weapons. ...
For national security a preemptive strike was carried out which bought us to invade. ... For the past 30 years the same politics have been carried out and we the American people do nothing about it, government agencies and independent analysts both come to the conclusion that carrying out this war would increase the threat to national security but it was disregarded for other reasons. ...
Also eliminated would be smarmy heart-to-heart "Elect because I"m like you even though my senate job has me set until I"m a hundred" political campaigns that play off of the Social Security scare. ... Current Social Security taxes could be slashed, as the government-owned petroleum refineries would be the cash cow Baby Boomers have been looking for. ... Regardless, consider the job security it would provide for the Iraqis. ...
Some other issues that Republicans would like to face would be creating a Department of Homeland Security, a port security and Coast Guard reauthorization bill, and they would also like to put their stamp on some traditionally Democratic issues, such as prescription drugs and education. ... "Let's see what we can do on things like prescription drugs and what we need to do to help the economy in terms of where we target tax cuts or let's control spending, but let's make sure we've got what we need to do the job on homeland security and in education." ...
The Bush Adminstation wants to go to war because Saddam Hussein has violated UN Security Council resolutions, and he is also abusing his own people, and have weapons of mass destruction. Thus, U.S. has violated UN Security Council resolutions on several occasions with providing dollars to aid the government of Turkey and nuclear armed Israel (www.commondreams.org) Going to war is not the right choice because even though Saddam Hussein does abuses and kills his own people, the U.S. will be killing more of his people. We also should not go to war because he violated the UN Security Council resol...
Barnett believes that these "gap" states will continue to be the incubator of terrorism until they are changed, a change that will not only bring security to the developed world but also bring prosperity and stability to the underdeveloped world. ... Security council showed signs of vetoing a US backed resolution calling for military intervention in Iraq. ... Friedman proposes revoking France's permanent status on the UN Security Council and replacing it with a more serious and regionally relevant nation. ... Changes that will benefit the well being of the state and the security of the...
The administration attempts to prove the threat from Iraq as critical; vital interest face unacceptable harm and danger by repeatedly invoking the memory of 9/11, the war on terrorism, the right of the American people to security against terrifying new threats revealed by the attack, and the duty of the government to provide that security at any and all costs. ... That any ruler we consider evil and hostile represents a danger to peace and American interests and security so much so that he must be overthrown by American military power. ... When the U.S. makes publicly clear that it intends t...
After twelve years of economic sanctions, two different arms-inspection forces, several Security Council resolutions and more than 200,000 coalition troops at his doorstep, Saddam Hussein still refused to give up his weapons of mass destruction and end his reign of terror. The fact is that Saddam was never going to abide by the Security Council's demand that he would disarm. ...
Initially, we were told by the Bush administration that Iraq posed a threat to the safety and security of the United States. ... Former Defence Sectary Madeline Albright believes that their was no reason to go to war with Iraq as Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction and he was not threat to world security, she described Saddam Hussein as being, "firmly in his box". ...
The United Nations Security Council was created to help in the case of disputes like the one in Iraq. ... (winwithoutwarus.org) Though every war action's circumstances are different I believe that if every government would just take the time to communicate properly, with the supervision of the United Nations Security council, and actually made the effort for peace, any dispute can be resolved without the need to go to war therefore avoiding all the negative affects that war brings to the world. ...
Resolution 14-41 was voted into affect unanimously by the U.N. security counsel for the immediate and complete disarming of Iraq. ... Bush for keeping our security in mind, and God bless our troops that are away from home right now awaiting orders to liberate a country, a region of oppressed people from a ruthless dictator that continues to bully the world....
Nixon refused to release the tapes; he said they were vital to national security. ... Also in 1975 the United States vetoes a Security Council resolution, which condemned Israeli, attacks on the Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon. ... The USSR saw Star Wars as a threat to their national security. ...
Kaplan and Kristol believes that the "Bush Doctrine " will lead to a better Iraq and a better world because the first element of the doctrine will allow the National Security of the United States to prevent an attack under the acknowledgement of certain circumstances. Lawrence Kaplan and William Kristol believe that the "Bush Doctrine " will authorize America's National Security to recognize and demolish any nation that poses a threat against America before the posed threat reaches danger within the states. Kaplan and Kristol point out that, "it was the Clinton administration that first...
Countries like Israel currently recognize the potential menace of Saddam Hussein and as a result, concerns have been raised about the overall security of the Middle East relative to the actions of Saddam Hussein. ... Conclusions Like the issues in other countries through out the world, the reemergence of challenges by Salaam Hussein in recent months has determined a call for a reassessment of the legal directives defined by the UN Security Council's resolutions. The UN Security Council initiated some 12 resolutions adopted prior to the onset of the Gulf War and a number of subse...
As Pollack argues, while in theory it might be possible to create arrangements that would improve the containment system, "such a deal is unimaginable in the UN Security Council today, where many of the members compete to see who can appease Iraq most."13 A person would be right to question any suggestion that we should just get inspectors back into Iraq and then our worries will be over. ...
President Bush felt security was one of the main keys to show the Iraqi people that our troops are there to help them in any way possible. ... Most of the times they barely have time to take a bite out their meals since they"re either doing some type of security around their parameter of defense or they"re on the go and there's nothing you can do about that. ...
For twelve years Saddam and his regime has continued to defy many United Nation Security Council resolutions, and has not accounted for weapons of mass destruction that he is known to have. On November 8th 2002, The UN Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1441 outlining an enhanced inspection regime for Iraq's disarmament to be conducted by the U.N. ...